The Public Relations Aspects of Litigation
March 12th, 2010Have you heard about the lawsuit actress Lindsay Lohan has filed against E*Trade seeking $100 million in damages? She claims the talking baby commercial that debuted during the Super Bowl about a “milkaholic” named Lindsay was about her, misappropriating her name, characterization, and personality.
To prevail in court will require Ms Lohan to prove that she is in the league of single name celebrities such as Oprah, Cher, Prince or Madonna. (You be the judge on that one.) It will also require proving a penchant for excessive drinking behavior, the kind associated with the suffix “holic.” Most folks would prefer to put their youthful indiscretions behind them, not broadcast them or have to offer proof of them in open court in a vain attempt to “win” a suit. After all, dirty laundry is well . . . dirty laundry.
Some will say that even bad publicity is better than no publicity. But to them I offer the case of Welch v. Welch. It’s the case about “Jack.” Or was he not famous enough to be the one name CEO? Doesn’t matter, this case wasn’t about fame. It was about divorce.
It was the case of former General Electric CEO Jack Welch that played out on the front page of the Wall Street Journal back in 2002 and the lesson is one about the unintended consequences of publicity associated with litigation.
Here’s what happened. Determined, in his iconic way, from having to pay Jane Welch more than he thought was fair, Jack refused to negotiate a higher settlement. That’s when the soon to be ex-Mrs. Welch, a former corporate lawyer who gave up her career for marriage, unpacked some dirty laundry in court papers. She exposed the very generous retirement perks Jack was enjoying complements of GE, including the use of a company owned New York apartment overlooking Central Park, free dry cleaning, flowers, wine, country club memberships, tickets to sporting events, a charge account at a posh restaurant, a cook, limousine service, even vitamins.
Occurring in the aftermath of the Enron, Tyco and WorldCom scandals, the news of Jack’s royal lifestyle, compliments of GE did not sit well with investors. There was a public backlash. As a result, two weeks after the perks made headlines Jack elected to give them up. The same day the Securities and Exchange Commission announced it would launch an informal investigation into Welch’s retirement package. It was a mess.
Who knows, had the details been kept out of the public spotlight, Mr. Welch might still be enjoying those perks today. He would have certainly been spared a great deal of unpleasantness.
Disputes are a fact of life, yet sometimes we need the help from a neutral third party to help resolve our differences with others. One way disputes can be resolved without going to court is through mediation.
If you or someone you know is interested in a behind the scenes look at how mediation works and how you can use it to get great results, join me when I interview professional mediator David DeLugas on March 16, at 8 pm Eastern (5 pm Pacific). For more information about this complimentary program click here.
And Lindsay, I hope you’ll join us too.