Archive for the 'Ethics' Category

From Lemons to Lemonade

Thursday, February 21st, 2008

 It’s no secret that the U.S. toy industry has been wrestling with product liability issues associated lead based paint used by their foreign suppliers.  Indeed, the health and safety of our children is so important that it has caused a shake-up at the Consumer Product Safety Commission and spawned pending legislation in Congress. 

Unfortunately, this “toy story” is an example of how cheap off-shore labor in unregulated environments can have unintended consequences when the exports subsequently land in markets with higher safety standards.  These disappointed expectations create legal liability, triggering product recalls and lawsuits.  It’s a cautionary tale of how the cheapest solution is not always the least expensive.  But in this case, one company is turning lemons into lemonade. 

Instead of trying to fight the lead paint battle by challenging test results, trivializing their significance, or blaming suppliers, Toys “R” Us took initiative last week and in a judo style flip turned the issue into a marketing coup.  

It voluntarily imposed strict guidelines on its vendors to insure compliance with higher safety standards aimed at reducing lead content in toy coatings.  It also executed a pre-emptive strike on another hot button issue: cadmium.  It instructed its vendors to take immediate steps to eliminate the use of nickle-cadmium batteries from all products manufactured exclusively for Toys “R” Us.  

Being proactive in addressing this product liability issue turns a growing concern and legal liability into a competitive advantage.  It helps build consumer confidence and helps burnish the company’s image as trustworthy.  It also distinguishes Toys “R” Us favorable by carving out a market segment and establishing itself as a leading source for safer toys.  As a new grandmother, I can tell you that such peace of mind is priceless.

Best of all, the company gets mileage out of regulating itself before Congress does it for them and making the announcement on the eve of the Annual American International Toy Fair to maximize buzz probably didn’t hurt either. 

Turning a legal liability into a competitive edge is what Legal Leverage(R) is all about; but you can’t achieve legal leverage without sufficient legal literacy to know where you’re at risk. 

A big Legal Literacy tip of the hat goes to Toys “R” Us this week.  Bravo!

QUOTE OF THE DAY: World Bank Lessons

Monday, May 21st, 2007

“I think it was a case of blind arrogance.”  

Former World Bank General Counsel Roberto Dañino on the Paul Wolfowitz scandal

Dañino’s no holds barred interview with Corporate Counsel recounts how Wolfowitz did an end run around the general counsel to avoid advice he didn’t like.  After Wolfowitz disagreed with Dañino’s initial advice he took the matter to the bank’s three-member ethics committee.  After that, Wolfowitz sought contract review from outside counsel.  Through forum shopping and selective disclosures he ultimately achieved the result he wanted: a fat compensation package for Shaha Riza, the World Bank’s Middle East specialist and his girlfriend.
 

It reminds me of what Enron’s Ken lay did after Sherron Watkins confronted him about her fear of an accounting scandal at Enron.  Lay agreed to have outside counsel at Vinson & Elkins look into the matter, and he did.  But to help engineer the desired result he instructed counsel not to challenge Arthur Anderson’s conclusions.  It was another “I know better than you” decision that ended badly.
 

LESSON #1:  Selective disclosures compromise the independent judgment of counsel and lead to Swiss cheese legal opinions that offer little protection when the sauce hits the fan.
 

LESSON #2:  Doggedly pursuing an end result with an “ends justify the means” attitude can blind smart people to important information and typically drives costs much higher than expected.