Archive for the ‘Smoking Guns’ Category

The economics of justice

Saturday, April 17th, 2010

Sometimes it just doesn’t seem fair. 

Take the situation Michael Steadman found himself in.  He bought a clock on eBay for $44.  When he got it in the mail it was in three pieces that according to him didn’t fit together or even appeared to be the same model.  He got a refund, but then did what a lot of folks are doing these days on the Internet.  He left his opinion on the seller’s eBay page.  Unfortunately for the seller, it was negative feedback.

More specifically, Michael said “Bad seller; he has the ethics of a used car salesman.”

Well, it turns out that the seller was a lawyer who was none too happy about having his perfect customer approval rating dinged.  So what do you think he did?  That’s right, he sued. 

Michael Steadman’s comment was the “smoking gun” document that formed the basis of a $15,000 defamation claim.  Even if Michael “wins” the suit, he’s already spent $7,000 defending himself and the nightmare is not over yet.  That’s the problem with the economics of justice.  Even if you’re right, it can be expensive to prove.

It reminds me of the story some friends told me over dinner the other night.  Seems their adult son had invented a new sports drink favored by bodybuilder.  His name of choice for the product had a “slight” resemblance to the trademarked name of a popular beverage made by a well known manufacturer who had billions of dollars in marketing expenses invested in it.  When he received a letter from Big Food requesting that he cease and desist use of the name, he did.  He simply didn’t have the money to fight them.

In the sports drink example the company’s cease and desist letter served as a warning shot.  It gave the inventor an opportunity to see the error of his ways and change course before anyone got hurt.  I’m not sure Michael had that opportunity with his disgruntled eBay seller.

You never know how aggressive someone is going to be.  That’s why it makes sense to ramp up your legal literacy.  It improves your decision making and lets you pick your fights instead of getting picked for a fight that is expensive to win or back out of.  Legal literacy can save you money and a lot of emotional wear and tear.

The Public Relations Aspects of Litigation

Friday, March 12th, 2010

Have you heard about the lawsuit actress Lindsay Lohan has filed against E*Trade seeking $100 million in damages?  She claims the talking baby commercial that debuted during the Super Bowl about a “milkaholic” named Lindsay was about her, misappropriating her name, characterization, and personality. 

To prevail in court will require Ms Lohan to prove that she is in the league of single name celebrities such as Oprah, Cher, Prince or Madonna.  (You be the judge on that one.)  It will also require proving a penchant for excessive drinking behavior, the kind associated with the suffix “holic.”   Most folks would prefer to put their youthful indiscretions behind them, not broadcast them or have to offer proof of them in open court in a vain attempt to “win” a suit.  After all, dirty laundry is well . . . dirty laundry.

Some will say that even bad publicity is better than no publicity.  But to them I offer the case of Welch v. Welch.  It’s the case about “Jack.”  Or was he not famous enough to be the one name CEO?  Doesn’t matter, this case wasn’t about fame.  It was about divorce. 

It was the case of former General Electric CEO Jack Welch that played out on the front page of the Wall Street Journal back in 2002 and the lesson is one about the unintended consequences of publicity associated with litigation.

Here’s what happened.  Determined, in his iconic way, from having to pay Jane Welch more than he thought was fair, Jack refused to negotiate a higher settlement.  That’s when the soon to be ex-Mrs. Welch, a former corporate lawyer who gave up her career for marriage, unpacked some dirty laundry in court papers.  She exposed the very generous retirement perks Jack was enjoying complements of GE, including the use of a company owned New York apartment overlooking Central Park, free dry cleaning, flowers, wine, country club memberships, tickets to sporting events, a charge account at a posh restaurant, a cook, limousine service, even vitamins.

Occurring in the aftermath of the Enron, Tyco and WorldCom scandals, the news of Jack’s royal lifestyle, compliments of GE did not sit well with investors.  There was a public backlash.  As a result, two weeks after the perks made headlines Jack elected to give them up.   The same day the Securities and Exchange Commission announced it would launch an informal investigation into Welch’s retirement package.  It was a mess.

Who knows, had the details been kept out of the public spotlight, Mr. Welch might still be enjoying those perks today.  He would have certainly been spared a great deal of unpleasantness.

Disputes are a fact of life, yet sometimes we need the help from a neutral third party to help resolve our differences with others.  One way disputes can be resolved without going to court is through mediation. 

If you or someone you know is interested in a behind the scenes look at how mediation works and how you can use it to get great results, join me when I interview professional mediator David DeLugas on March 16, at 8 pm Eastern (5 pm Pacific).  For more information about this complimentary program click here.

And Lindsay, I hope you’ll join us too.

Five critical legal literacy steps

Thursday, October 1st, 2009

[Editor's note: Today's guest blogger article is a follow-up on last night's Ask the No Nonsense Lawyer interview with Kathy Lang.  Special thanks goes to Ms Lang and the firm of Dickinson Wright.]

The Anticipation of Litigation:  Five Critical Steps to Manage Risks and Costs

By Kathleen A. Lang and Erin J. Stovel

Dickinson Wright PLLC

In today’s economic climate, no company can afford to waste its resources – human or financial.  However, when litigation is threatened, an initial investment of resources to preserve evidence and prepare the defense is critical.  In fact, by taking the proper steps when first notified of a potential claim or litigation, the risks of litigation can be better managed, and the overall exposure and costs spent in litigation can be limited.

 1. Investigate. Often there is notice of a potential claim or litigation long before a lawsuit is filed. Such notices can include demand letters, law enforcement/regulatory inquiries, or an event itself may suggest future claims (such as the occurrence of a personal injury while on a business property or the termination of a problematic employee). However the initial notice of a potential claim is received, it is important to first ascertain and memorialize all of the critical information that may be relevant; such as who the key players are and whether there are documents that relate to the claim. Since there can be significant time lapses between the first notice of a lawsuit and when a lawsuit is actually commenced, it is usually a good idea to interview the important people as soon as possible in order to preserve their best recollections before memories fade.

2. Preserve Evidence. Today many lawsuits do not focus on the merits of a claim, but rather discovery battles over the preservation of evidence before and during litigation. During the initial investigation, steps should be taken to locate, preserve and prepare to produce all information (if it later becomes necessary), including electronically stored information, such as e-mail and data stored on computer hard drives, networks, servers and certain backup media that is, or may be, relevant to the subject matter of the potential litigation. Although not an exhaustive list, the following steps should be considered:

 a. Suspend all protocols that relate to the routine destruction of electronic and hard copy data that may be relevant to the litigation. This includes the overwriting and recycling of archive or backup tapes routinely used for storing and retrieving information. This is typically accomplished with the circulation of a “litigation freeze order” or “litigation hold.” As a general rule, a litigation hold does not apply to inaccessible backup tapes such as those maintained solely for disaster recovery purposes. Counsel can assist you in preparing and implementing a litigation hold.

b. Notify the key players who likely possesses relevant hard copy and electronic information, and instruct them (a) not to destroy any such information, (b) to preserve indefinitely all such information, whether stored in active or archived files, including on PDAs (e.g. Palm Pilots or BlackBerrys), laptops, computer systems or networks, and (c) to place any later-created relevant information into a separate electronic file appropriately labeled.

 c. Appoint a person who will be responsible for implementing, supervising and enforcing these safeguards. Counsel should meet with the person so designated to more fully explain the scope of that person’s responsibility and the current state of the law.

 3. Assess the Risk. Assess the merits of the potential claims with counsel. A detailed assessment of claims may lead to opportunities for an early resolution of a claim before engaging in protracted litigation.

4. Ensure Litigation Prerequisites Are Exhausted. Prior to the commencement of litigation, there may exist certain prerequisites that must be exhausted (administrative remedies, contractual requirements, pre-suit notice). In highly regulated industries, for example, there may be administrative regulations barring litigation, or certain steps that a party must take prior to going to court.

 5. Comply With Orders. At the commencement of litigation or afterwards, the court may issue orders relating to the production of information. Full compliance with any such orders will be extremely important. It is also very important that you notify counsel immediately if you become aware of any potential compliance failures, regardless of their perceived severity. Fulfilling all of these obligations will reduce the likelihood that discovery and document preservation issues will unduly impact the litigation.

 

While no company desires to be involved with litigation, these precautionary steps can help to manage the risks and costs of litigation.  Often it is important to have counsel involved in this initial phase in order to manage the process and look for other specific measures that should be undertaken to protect the client in the event of litigation.  This initial investment of resources in these types of preparatory actions can result in savings, both in terms of the overall exposure if litigation arises and the costs of litigation.

‘Twink’ before you tweet

Thursday, August 13th, 2009

The need for legal literacy doesn’t end with new fangled technology platforms such as Twitter.  Just because Twitter is fast and easy doesn’t mean that others won’t try to hold you accountable for what you say. 

Free speech doesn’t mean you can say whatever you want.  Just ask Mark Cuban, the Dallas Maverick’s owner, who was fined by the league for slamming an official refereeing the Maverick-Nuggets game.  That was a $25,000 boo-boo.

Unfortunately, more people are being dragged into court due to indiscrete tweets, giving rise to Twitter torts, or as I prefer to call them “tworts.”  These tweets are the latest examples of smoking gun rule #3 (choose and use your communication channel wisely).

The lesson from these emerging tworts is clear — it always pays to twink before you tweet.

© Corporate M.O., LLC 2009