<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legal Literacy &#187; Smoking Guns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://legalliteracy.com/blog/category/smoking-guns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://legalliteracy.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 01:15:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The economics of justice</title>
		<link>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2010/04/17/the-economics-of-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2010/04/17/the-economics-of-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hanna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blind Spots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decision Making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cease and desist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark enforcement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalliteracy.com/blog/?p=1149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Legal literacy improves your decision making and lets you pick your fights instead of getting picked for a fight that is expensive to win or back out of.  It can save you money and a lot of emotional wear and tear.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2010/04/17/the-economics-of-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Public Relations Aspects of Litigation</title>
		<link>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2010/03/12/the-public-relations-aspects-of-litigation/</link>
		<comments>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2010/03/12/the-public-relations-aspects-of-litigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hanna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blind Spots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decision Making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE perks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Welch divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Lohan suit agains E*Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[milkaholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single name celebrities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value of mediation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalliteracy.com/blog/?p=1117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you heard about the lawsuit actress Lindsay Lohan has filed against E*Trade seeking $100 million in damages?  She claims the talking baby commercial that debuted during the Super Bowl about a “milkaholic” named Lindsay was about her, misappropriating her name, characterization, and personality.  To prevail in court will require Ms Lohan to prove that she is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2010/03/12/the-public-relations-aspects-of-litigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five critical legal literacy steps</title>
		<link>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/10/01/five-critical-legal-literacy-steps/</link>
		<comments>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/10/01/five-critical-legal-literacy-steps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hanna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blind Spots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dickinson Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[document discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erin Stovel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathy Lang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[threat of litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalliteracy.com/blog/?p=1012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Editor's note: Today's guest blogger article is a follow-up on last night's Ask the No Nonsense Lawyer interview with Kathy Lang.  Special thanks goes to Ms Lang and the firm of Dickinson Wright.] The Anticipation of Litigation:  Five Critical Steps to Manage Risks and Costs By Kathleen A. Lang and Erin J. Stovel Dickinson Wright [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/10/01/five-critical-legal-literacy-steps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Twink&#8217; before you tweet</title>
		<link>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/08/13/twink-before-you-tweet/</link>
		<comments>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/08/13/twink-before-you-tweet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hanna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blind Spots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas Mavericks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Cuban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter torts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tworts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalliteracy.com/blog/?p=959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The need for legal literacy doesn&#8217;t end with new fangled technology platforms such as Twitter.  Just because Twitter is fast and easy doesn&#8217;t mean that others won&#8217;t try to hold you accountable for what you say.  Free speech doesn&#8217;t mean you can say whatever you want.  Just ask Mark Cuban, the Dallas Maverick&#8217;s owner, who [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/08/13/twink-before-you-tweet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quote of the Day: It&#8217;s your job to know</title>
		<link>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/07/13/quote-of-the-day-its-your-job-to-know/</link>
		<comments>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/07/13/quote-of-the-day-its-your-job-to-know/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hanna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Blind Spots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quote of the Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Azerbaijan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dooney & Bourke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Corrupt Practices Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frederic Bourke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal literacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalliteracy.com/blog/?p=947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We thought he knew and he definitely should have known.  He&#8217;s an investor.  It&#8217;s his job to know.  We thought the tape was damning. Jury foreman David Murphy discussing the conviction of Frederic Bourke Jr. (the co-founder of handbag maker Dooney &#38; Bourke Inc.) of conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practice Act in connection [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/07/13/quote-of-the-day-its-your-job-to-know/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marveling at Marvell</title>
		<link>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/05/07/marveling-at-marvell/</link>
		<comments>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/05/07/marveling-at-marvell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 03:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hanna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blind Spots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effective Apology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jasmine Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kador]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marvell Semiconductor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalliteracy.com/blog/?p=871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The case has been around for almost a decade.  Jasmine Networks claims that rival Marvell Semiconductor stole its trade secrets and engaged in an unfair trade practice by hiring away Jasmine&#8217;s engineering group. Sounds like a classic lawsuit except that part of what has kept this case alive for so long involves a phone call [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/05/07/marveling-at-marvell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mixed media sends mixed signals</title>
		<link>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/05/04/mixed-media-sends-mixed-signals/</link>
		<comments>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/05/04/mixed-media-sends-mixed-signals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 02:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hanna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blind Spots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decision Making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal risk management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misunderstanding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monica Hesse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalliteracy.com/blog/?p=862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I was reminded of a bad date I went on many years ago in the pre-cell phone age.  We were supposed to meet in front of a Greek restaurant for dinner.  We were both on time and we both thought we were at the front entrance.  Mine was on the pedestrian mall side.  His [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/05/04/mixed-media-sends-mixed-signals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should employers intervene when an employee&#8217;s MySpace page creates the appearance of impropriety?</title>
		<link>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/03/12/should-employers-intervene-when-an-employees-myspace-page-creates-the-appearance-of-impropriety/</link>
		<comments>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/03/12/should-employers-intervene-when-an-employees-myspace-page-creates-the-appearance-of-impropriety/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 03:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hanna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blind Spots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["too much information"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaughan Ettienne]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalliteracy.com/blog/?p=742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Too much information,&#8221; said my husband.  We&#8217;d just passed a college coed who needed a fashion police Miranda warning.   I sighed in agreement &#8211; seems that some folks will pay a high price to be cool.    In a slightly different venue, Officer Vaughan Ettienne also paid a high price to be cool, only his fashion statement was one of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/03/12/should-employers-intervene-when-an-employees-myspace-page-creates-the-appearance-of-impropriety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nan Russell&#8217;s Work Matters</title>
		<link>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/02/16/nan-russells-work-matters/</link>
		<comments>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/02/16/nan-russells-work-matters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hanna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blind Spots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decision Making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hitting Your Stride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nan Russell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalliteracy.com/blog/?p=701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had the privilege of being interviewed by Nan Russell on her Work Matters show.  She focuses on practical business tips and advice.  Our topic of discussion was one of my favorites: smoking gun emails and how to avoid them.  Also included on the segment is Beth Pelkofsky discussing options businesses can consider before layoffs.  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/02/16/nan-russells-work-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smoking gun emails and other business headaches</title>
		<link>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/01/27/could-your-office-emails-be-sabotaging-your-career/</link>
		<comments>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/01/27/could-your-office-emails-be-sabotaging-your-career/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hanna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blind Spots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking Guns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalliteracy.com/blog/?p=647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday morning at the crack of dawn I spoke to Rick Barber on newsradio 850 KOA &#8211; AM in Denver, Colorado about how to cover your &#8220;assets&#8221; at work, starting with company emails.   To listen to the podcast click here.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://legalliteracy.com/blog/2009/01/27/could-your-office-emails-be-sabotaging-your-career/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://a1135.g.akamai.net/f/1135/18227/1h/cchannel.download.akamai.com/18227/podcast/DENVER-CO/KOA-AM/rick%20mon%201-26-09%20hr%204.mp3" length="15442286" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
